Job application etiquette: the polite rejection letter
A lawyer I know sent me the following email exchange relating to an interview for employment at a trusts & estates firm in Boston. I verified its authenticity from both ends of the exchange, but have taken pity on the law firm, and will withhold its name and that of its administrator. The exchange demonstrates the importance of examining email addresses closely for unexpected things like middle initials or appended numbers. (For ease of reading, I’ve rearranged the thread so you can read from top to bottom.)
From: [A.L.]
Date: February 14, 2007
Subject: Law clerk position
To: [Samuel F.]
Hi Sam,
I am in touch with you regarding your email to M[.] L[.] about employment with our firm. We are currently looking for a temporary law clerk.
I’d be happy to meet with you. Please let me know when you’re available.
Thanks!
A[.] L[.]
Administrator
[Law Firm and address omitted]
Boston, MA 02108
From: Samuel F[.]
Date: Feb 20, 2007 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Law clerk position
To: [A.L.]
Dear Ms. L.,
Your message was a pleasant surprise. Regrettably, I must decline. My schedule as a second-grader is quite hectic already. Moreover, I am very busy planning my eighth birthday party next month.
I will of course keep you in mind when I graduate from law school in 2024.
Yours,
Samuel F[.]
Yesterday I spoke to A.L., who said she’d meant to write to a different Samuel F.–a recent graduate of American University Law School who had submitted a resume to the firm–but had inadvertently omitted a character from the email address.
Since the Samuel F. who received the email also happens to be the son of a lawyer, I have my suspicions that his father may have lent him some assistance with his reply.
I have to say, this points out a disadvantage of using a popular e-mail service such as yahoo, cox, or aol. A unique domain name costs a little bit, but you can get a simple and memorable address which is not likely to be mis-typed. Also, if it is mis-typed, the sender would be likely to get a bounceback rather than send to a valid address.
Funny as this is, I thought it might be prudent here to advise people not to respond to unsolictited emails. Quite often the results aren’t so hilarious.
Yes, John. In fact, you may remember that that was one of the problems the Recording Industry Association of America encountered when it began to sue people who were uploading large numbers of copyrighted songs to peer-to-peer sites. The RIAA obtained information about the email account owners from their ISPs by subpoena, and then sued the account owners. So they ended up suing some children who happened to have broadband accounts in their own names.
A second-grader has an email address?!
- Law and economics 2.0
- A no-fly zone to protect Linux from patent trolls
- Did big patent ruling doom software patents?
- Google and Yahoo fight with the feds
- Google and Yahoo fight with the feds
- Russia v Bank of New York: How weak can a case get?
- eBay rulings relating to counterfeiting — English translations
- Russia is a no-show in its suit against the Bank of New York
- U.S. prosecutors refute Russian claim in suit against Bank of New York
- Cloud of uncertainty over non-profit HMOs
- I am willing to pay for value. When I... More
- I plan to auction a house from govern... More
- The recession is far from over. There... More
- I'll believe the recession is over wh... More
- No, I do not think the recession is o... More
- Interesting article, and commendable ... More
- I switched careers at age 57 from the... More
- Interesting that the primary focus fr... More
- as a homedepot "home service" custome... More
- Nice article - BUT - Carol Tome is li... More



I think the 2 second grader should have just accepted the job offer. A law firm job is a pot of gold at the end of ladder of “institutionalized education” if that pot of gold is delivered to him in 2nd grade/ bottom rung, why climb all the way to the top!
Morever, if he accepted and dropped out of second grade, you might have a cause action for damages/ restitution and reliance.