<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fortune 500: Exxon Mobil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/</link>
	<description>From Microsoft to MySpace, Fortune magazine writers share their unique insights about the business of technology every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anna Bertholf, Mebane, NC</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-4285</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Bertholf, Mebane, NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 17:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-4285</guid>
		<description>So you hate Walmart? Don&#039;t shop there. The way to express your disdain of  Walmart&#039;s business practices is to take your money elsewhere and encourage others to do the same. No amount of whining or complaining is going to change such a huge machine. The bottom line in all decisions made in that corporation&#039;s structure is MONEY/PROFIT. You may think Walmart is going to Hell in a handbasket, but as long as we offer tax breaks and incentives to corporations who obtain most of their goods from foreign nations then bombard us with low priced, unsafe and shoddy merchandise, Walmart/Walmart wannabes will rule. Sending jobs to other nations and allowing skilled individuals in this country to lose their livelihood because we sit on our hands and don&#039;t vote to make necessary changes to the basic structure of how America does business, makes us all as guilty as Walmart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you hate Walmart? Don&#8217;t shop there. The way to express your disdain of  Walmart&#8217;s business practices is to take your money elsewhere and encourage others to do the same. No amount of whining or complaining is going to change such a huge machine. The bottom line in all decisions made in that corporation&#8217;s structure is MONEY/PROFIT. You may think Walmart is going to Hell in a handbasket, but as long as we offer tax breaks and incentives to corporations who obtain most of their goods from foreign nations then bombard us with low priced, unsafe and shoddy merchandise, Walmart/Walmart wannabes will rule. Sending jobs to other nations and allowing skilled individuals in this country to lose their livelihood because we sit on our hands and don&#8217;t vote to make necessary changes to the basic structure of how America does business, makes us all as guilty as Walmart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Carlson, Houston Texas</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-4168</link>
		<dc:creator>John Carlson, Houston Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-4168</guid>
		<description>I think ExxonMobil deserves everything they get. They work hard and they are not made of hippies. Also their stance on Global Warming is the best in the world. I have and I do work there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think ExxonMobil deserves everything they get. They work hard and they are not made of hippies. Also their stance on Global Warming is the best in the world. I have and I do work there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason, San Jose, CA</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason, San Jose, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>It strikes me that 3 of the top 5 revenue and the top profit goes to oil companies. Eveyone complains about gas prices and these people are raking it in? They are gouging us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It strikes me that 3 of the top 5 revenue and the top profit goes to oil companies. Eveyone complains about gas prices and these people are raking it in? They are gouging us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark, Los Angeles, CA</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-3466</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark, Los Angeles, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-3466</guid>
		<description>This store is terrible.  Everything is made in China, and it&#039;s all junk.  Their corporate motto is:  Cheap crap sells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This store is terrible.  Everything is made in China, and it&#8217;s all junk.  Their corporate motto is:  Cheap crap sells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hamilton, Owensboro, KY</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hamilton, Owensboro, KY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about New York, but in Owensboro, KY Wal-Mart has raised it&#039;s prices across the board recently here about 15-20% after the Christmas holidays, including grocery items.
We have been faithful with Wal-Mart until now with our grocery buying, but have started to venture to more attractive prices at stores like Kroger.
Please check out the rest of the nation on their pricing not just the reports that they give on their profits. It sounds like their profits are coming from the increased prices as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about New York, but in Owensboro, KY Wal-Mart has raised it&#8217;s prices across the board recently here about 15-20% after the Christmas holidays, including grocery items.<br />
We have been faithful with Wal-Mart until now with our grocery buying, but have started to venture to more attractive prices at stores like Kroger.<br />
Please check out the rest of the nation on their pricing not just the reports that they give on their profits. It sounds like their profits are coming from the increased prices as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crystal, dayton ohio</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-3075</link>
		<dc:creator>crystal, dayton ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-3075</guid>
		<description>I just started at wal-mart. I feel i am treated like a kid. The people that have been at walmart long term are to afraid to move on there use to the abuse. Well i dont want use to that. Sam is gone. It is all corporate politics and who you know. The long term employees stay due to fear of change. Sure wal mart is awesome if its all you want to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just started at wal-mart. I feel i am treated like a kid. The people that have been at walmart long term are to afraid to move on there use to the abuse. Well i dont want use to that. Sam is gone. It is all corporate politics and who you know. The long term employees stay due to fear of change. Sure wal mart is awesome if its all you want to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Schafer-Akron, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Schafer-Akron, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1857</guid>
		<description>Who ever thought there would be a time when staying warm in your home, being able to afford good food, being able to afford gasoline for the car, or praying you don&#039;t get sick enough to lose everything you have worked for would happen in the United States. So, keep buying all your good at Walmart, and maybe, as the economy nose-dives, you can use your Walmart toilet paper, as you go to the bathroom in the creek, next to your hut, which is all you will be able to afford---The New Middle Class America!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who ever thought there would be a time when staying warm in your home, being able to afford good food, being able to afford gasoline for the car, or praying you don&#8217;t get sick enough to lose everything you have worked for would happen in the United States. So, keep buying all your good at Walmart, and maybe, as the economy nose-dives, you can use your Walmart toilet paper, as you go to the bathroom in the creek, next to your hut, which is all you will be able to afford&#8212;The New Middle Class America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom, Youngstown, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom, Youngstown, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>GET SMART you bargain-shopping idiots!
Walmart sells Americans well over 90-percent chinese-made products. As the nations largest retailer, what do you think this is doing to American manufacturing jobs? Duh!!! And I am a life-long republican who believes in capitalism and is against labor unions (in north-east Ohio of all places)! But let&#039;s keep it in America and figure out how to balance our greed with our love for cheap products!
Anyone ever hear the phrase...&quot;you get what you pay for&quot;!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GET SMART you bargain-shopping idiots!<br />
Walmart sells Americans well over 90-percent chinese-made products. As the nations largest retailer, what do you think this is doing to American manufacturing jobs? Duh!!! And I am a life-long republican who believes in capitalism and is against labor unions (in north-east Ohio of all places)! But let&#8217;s keep it in America and figure out how to balance our greed with our love for cheap products!<br />
Anyone ever hear the phrase&#8230;&#8221;you get what you pay for&#8221;!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john paul, ocala fl.</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>john paul, ocala fl.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>wrong, corporations were not chartered to serve the people. They were however created to make money for owners, stockholders or investoers. Non-Profits serve a different purpose, but let&#039;s not confuse the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrong, corporations were not chartered to serve the people. They were however created to make money for owners, stockholders or investoers. Non-Profits serve a different purpose, but let&#8217;s not confuse the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa, Nashville TN</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa, Nashville TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>If eveyone keeps turing a blind eye on Wal-Mart&#039;s injustices it dishes out to employees, communities, suppliers, and yes even shoppers what will happen when Wal-Mart no longer has any competition? I vote with my money and I will never vote for Wal-Mart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If eveyone keeps turing a blind eye on Wal-Mart&#8217;s injustices it dishes out to employees, communities, suppliers, and yes even shoppers what will happen when Wal-Mart no longer has any competition? I vote with my money and I will never vote for Wal-Mart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Gaines, Phoenix, AZ</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Gaines, Phoenix, AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>Pinnacle West outsourced my job to India</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pinnacle West outsourced my job to India</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev.Dr.Robert E.H.Peeples</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev.Dr.Robert E.H.Peeples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>Both Fannie and Freddie have done magnificent jobs for our Country, arousing the jealousy several of our largest banks and seemingly the displeasure of the Wall Street Journal&#039;s editors. And then, there&#039;s the greed of Fannie and Freddie&#039;s officers and directors, using all sorts of devices to push their incomes higher (certainly at the expense of the F&amp;F shareholders). And derivatives do NOT work for what they are supposed to do. 
   Is it any wonder F&amp;F are in trouble? No. B ut Fannie did work through similar trouble back in the 1980s. I say, let them do it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Fannie and Freddie have done magnificent jobs for our Country, arousing the jealousy several of our largest banks and seemingly the displeasure of the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s editors. And then, there&#8217;s the greed of Fannie and Freddie&#8217;s officers and directors, using all sorts of devices to push their incomes higher (certainly at the expense of the F&amp;F shareholders). And derivatives do NOT work for what they are supposed to do.<br />
   Is it any wonder F&amp;F are in trouble? No. B ut Fannie did work through similar trouble back in the 1980s. I say, let them do it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yadgyu, Harkeyville, TX</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>Yadgyu, Harkeyville, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s really too bad these “big” companies are profiting from the labor and loss of the American worker.&quot; - Posted By Un Easy Newtonia Missouri 

Profit can never be bad.

Corporate excess is a direct result of consumer excess. Any company that is successful is only successful because they have customres who continue to buy goods and services from them. If people would learn to consume less and save more, companies would downsize and people would gain steady employment in stable industries.
If workers would learn to live with less money, then the economy would balance itself out. Many of these companies that sell non-essential goods and services would go out of business. Some companies would cut back on offering certain goods and services. This would cause temporary layoffs, but in a few years the economy woudl rebound and become resilient. 

Nobody wants to lose jobs. But many of the jobs out here are not very essential to the well-being of others. If people bought less fast food, smaller vehicles, less entertainment, and cheaper education, the middle class could easily survive with lower wages. The problem is that new trends are followed and people get jobs with companies that are not meant to last long. As soon as Americans start consuming less, the middle class will become comfortable and stable once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s really too bad these “big” companies are profiting from the labor and loss of the American worker.&#8221; &#8211; Posted By Un Easy Newtonia Missouri </p>
<p>Profit can never be bad.</p>
<p>Corporate excess is a direct result of consumer excess. Any company that is successful is only successful because they have customres who continue to buy goods and services from them. If people would learn to consume less and save more, companies would downsize and people would gain steady employment in stable industries.<br />
If workers would learn to live with less money, then the economy would balance itself out. Many of these companies that sell non-essential goods and services would go out of business. Some companies would cut back on offering certain goods and services. This would cause temporary layoffs, but in a few years the economy woudl rebound and become resilient. </p>
<p>Nobody wants to lose jobs. But many of the jobs out here are not very essential to the well-being of others. If people bought less fast food, smaller vehicles, less entertainment, and cheaper education, the middle class could easily survive with lower wages. The problem is that new trends are followed and people get jobs with companies that are not meant to last long. As soon as Americans start consuming less, the middle class will become comfortable and stable once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Kelemen, Fullerton, CA</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Kelemen, Fullerton, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>Delta is going down.  It is failing.  Try using your frequent flier mileage (Sky Miles) to book a domestic RT flight for 25,000 miles.  IMPOSSIBLE.  You&#039;ll need 50,000.  Unable to operate competitively, Delta will go down.  Pull out while you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delta is going down.  It is failing.  Try using your frequent flier mileage (Sky Miles) to book a domestic RT flight for 25,000 miles.  IMPOSSIBLE.  You&#8217;ll need 50,000.  Unable to operate competitively, Delta will go down.  Pull out while you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic, Houston, TX</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1296</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic, Houston, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-1296</guid>
		<description>There are several things most of those who criticize the “oil giants” seem to fail to recognize:

(1) More of the profits of at least the top two “oil giants”, ExxonMobil and Chevron, come from outside the U. S. than here.

(2) More of their profits come from “upstream” (exploration and production) than from “downstream” (refining and marketing).

(3) The company with the greatest U. S. refinery capacity is Valero, not ExxonMobil or Chevron.  However they operate primarily in the U. S. (they have a refinery in Aruba and interests in Canada) and no U. S. crude production.  They are opening retail outlets under the Valero name but primarily supply “quick sacks” and companies that market gasoline (such as grocery stores) but do not produce any.  They make only about 6% on revenues.

(4) Probably the third and fourth largest oil companies are not U. S. companies but BP (British) and Shell (Dutch).  

In fact BP might be larger than Chevron.  They now own several companies that used to be U. S. companies.  I believe their first purchase was a couple of refineries and some (older) gas stations once owned by Sinclair they bought when Sinclair was taken over by Atlantic Richfield (ARCO).  They then bought Standard Oil (Ohio).  ARCO itself (who first discovered oil on the North Slope of Alaska) was next and they purchased Amoco (formerly Standard of Indiana) most recently.

Venezuela (Chavez) is in the picture as well.  They own CITGO (formerly Cities Service) and until recently shared ownership of Lyondell – Citgo.  Lyondell was a “spin off” from ARCO. 

Even the “big camel,” Saudi Arabia, has a “nose under the tent.”  They have a half interest in a company called Motive with a refinery in Louisiana.

(5) The “oil giants” also make a lot of their money on natural gas sales.  I can’t find details on crude vs. gas profits in any of the data I have but they are investing heavily, (mostly overseas again) on finding gas and transporting it as LNG to the U. S.

(6) At least ExxonMobil and Chevron collect and pay far more in taxes (no company actually “pays” taxes they merely collect them and pass the costs to their customers) than they make in profits.  But again most is outside the U. S., where most of their profits come from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several things most of those who criticize the “oil giants” seem to fail to recognize:</p>
<p>(1) More of the profits of at least the top two “oil giants”, ExxonMobil and Chevron, come from outside the U. S. than here.</p>
<p>(2) More of their profits come from “upstream” (exploration and production) than from “downstream” (refining and marketing).</p>
<p>(3) The company with the greatest U. S. refinery capacity is Valero, not ExxonMobil or Chevron.  However they operate primarily in the U. S. (they have a refinery in Aruba and interests in Canada) and no U. S. crude production.  They are opening retail outlets under the Valero name but primarily supply “quick sacks” and companies that market gasoline (such as grocery stores) but do not produce any.  They make only about 6% on revenues.</p>
<p>(4) Probably the third and fourth largest oil companies are not U. S. companies but BP (British) and Shell (Dutch).  </p>
<p>In fact BP might be larger than Chevron.  They now own several companies that used to be U. S. companies.  I believe their first purchase was a couple of refineries and some (older) gas stations once owned by Sinclair they bought when Sinclair was taken over by Atlantic Richfield (ARCO).  They then bought Standard Oil (Ohio).  ARCO itself (who first discovered oil on the North Slope of Alaska) was next and they purchased Amoco (formerly Standard of Indiana) most recently.</p>
<p>Venezuela (Chavez) is in the picture as well.  They own CITGO (formerly Cities Service) and until recently shared ownership of Lyondell – Citgo.  Lyondell was a “spin off” from ARCO. </p>
<p>Even the “big camel,” Saudi Arabia, has a “nose under the tent.”  They have a half interest in a company called Motive with a refinery in Louisiana.</p>
<p>(5) The “oil giants” also make a lot of their money on natural gas sales.  I can’t find details on crude vs. gas profits in any of the data I have but they are investing heavily, (mostly overseas again) on finding gas and transporting it as LNG to the U. S.</p>
<p>(6) At least ExxonMobil and Chevron collect and pay far more in taxes (no company actually “pays” taxes they merely collect them and pass the costs to their customers) than they make in profits.  But again most is outside the U. S., where most of their profits come from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un Easy Newtonia Missouri</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Un Easy Newtonia Missouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-938</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really too bad these &quot;big&quot; companies are profiting from the labor and loss of the American worker. Wages and bennifits are being cut and profits are going up. You all wanna send our jobs out of country? Well pack up and get out and dont bother trying to sell us your forgin made crap. One of these days you will find your self with out workers or customers. You&#039;ll cut your selves out of work. Good riddence! Wake up Corporate America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really too bad these &#8220;big&#8221; companies are profiting from the labor and loss of the American worker. Wages and bennifits are being cut and profits are going up. You all wanna send our jobs out of country? Well pack up and get out and dont bother trying to sell us your forgin made crap. One of these days you will find your self with out workers or customers. You&#8217;ll cut your selves out of work. Good riddence! Wake up Corporate America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomray, Boulder, CO</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomray, Boulder, CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-916</guid>
		<description>I have no professional experience with Exxon - I do invest in XOM and have been pleased. However, from my experience in the computer field, Exxon looks very good, if your background fits (not for computer folks, however - go to IBM, or HPQ, or the like). Exxon is big, very profitable, and the critical value of oil and exploration, extraction, and processing, and Exxon&#039;s presence in all aspects of energy and oil, assures decades of stable growth and job opportunities. Starting out in a large company has the tremendous advantage of learning the business, getting continuing education, great health care, IRAs, and stability. The time to work for a smaller company is when you already have the expertise that is critical to the business and will provide a major jump in salary, position, and possibly stock options prior to an IPO. Nothing replaces doing the research about your specific position within a company, its value and your opportunity for growth - you must do that yourself. Do you have the specific skills that Exxon wants? Have you considered further education? Are you an engineer or scientist, especially in geoscience or chemistry, possibly with a masters degree in marketing? Then Exxon would provide professional development while offering a reasonable lifestyle (I&#039;d beware the travel and transfer expectations, however, unless you want to travel, and if so, Exxon might be all the better). Be careful. All large companies have divisions and managers that can make life miserable. Know who will be your boss and how he treats people - ask one of the people &quot;on the team&quot;. If that costs you the job, you don&#039;t want it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no professional experience with Exxon &#8211; I do invest in XOM and have been pleased. However, from my experience in the computer field, Exxon looks very good, if your background fits (not for computer folks, however &#8211; go to IBM, or HPQ, or the like). Exxon is big, very profitable, and the critical value of oil and exploration, extraction, and processing, and Exxon&#8217;s presence in all aspects of energy and oil, assures decades of stable growth and job opportunities. Starting out in a large company has the tremendous advantage of learning the business, getting continuing education, great health care, IRAs, and stability. The time to work for a smaller company is when you already have the expertise that is critical to the business and will provide a major jump in salary, position, and possibly stock options prior to an IPO. Nothing replaces doing the research about your specific position within a company, its value and your opportunity for growth &#8211; you must do that yourself. Do you have the specific skills that Exxon wants? Have you considered further education? Are you an engineer or scientist, especially in geoscience or chemistry, possibly with a masters degree in marketing? Then Exxon would provide professional development while offering a reasonable lifestyle (I&#8217;d beware the travel and transfer expectations, however, unless you want to travel, and if so, Exxon might be all the better). Be careful. All large companies have divisions and managers that can make life miserable. Know who will be your boss and how he treats people &#8211; ask one of the people &#8220;on the team&#8221;. If that costs you the job, you don&#8217;t want it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan Bush, Blackshear, Georgia</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan Bush, Blackshear, Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Quite frankly, I&#039;m surprised that Pepsi is that much higher than Coca-Cola on the Fortune list.  Not that that&#039;s necessarily a bad thing.  I avidly partake in the consumption of Pepsi products and rather prefer them to Coke products (with one or two exceptions).  I simply find it a strange thing that the country&#039;s most recognizable brand isn&#039;t higher (no sarcasm intended).  Of course, maybe I&#039;m not as economically savvy as I should be.  

In any event, keep pushing, Coca-Cola, and Pepsi, keep up the great(er) work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite frankly, I&#8217;m surprised that Pepsi is that much higher than Coca-Cola on the Fortune list.  Not that that&#8217;s necessarily a bad thing.  I avidly partake in the consumption of Pepsi products and rather prefer them to Coke products (with one or two exceptions).  I simply find it a strange thing that the country&#8217;s most recognizable brand isn&#8217;t higher (no sarcasm intended).  Of course, maybe I&#8217;m not as economically savvy as I should be.  </p>
<p>In any event, keep pushing, Coca-Cola, and Pepsi, keep up the great(er) work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa,beaumont,Tx</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa,beaumont,Tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-563</guid>
		<description>why is there not a list for the worse companies to work for</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is there not a list for the worse companies to work for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Luchtefeld, Lexington, KY</title>
		<link>http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Luchtefeld, Lexington, KY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.blogs.fortune.com/2007/04/13/fortune-500-company-2/#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Drug companies have been extremely profitable because during the Reagan administration, legislation was passed that favored them, and the added wealth has enabled them to lobby aggressively for laws that are even more favorable to their economics, and no one has bothered to stop them.  There are whole books about this.  
The argument about drug companies needing big $$ for R&amp;D is of course made weak when you notice twice as much is spent on their advertising budget.  Scary, considering we are the only industrialized country that allows direct-to-consumer advertisement.  Which of course pressure on doctors because patients come in asking for the drug by name, and the doctor that doesn&#039;t prescribe that may lose a customer.  As for Walmart, I doubt nepotism/ favoritism is an encouraged corporate policy, but low-price/discount type companies tend to pay little and therefore end up with poor management judgment, especially on a local level.  Same kind of thing can be found in fast food chains and so on.  I have no good advice for the people exploited by this scenario due to lack of other job options.  Pack up and move?  Easier said than done, of course.  Microsoft profits are irrelevant,  because when it comes to lower income families and &quot;survival&quot;, computer equipment has never been a necessity compared to drugs and food, and even gas to get to work.  Want online access?  Move near a town with a library with necessary resources that are free.  But again, easier said than done.  A completely corporate-owned government is becoming more a reality every day, but in the end, it&#039;s our own fault because we are letting it happen by buying these products, electing any crook with an ivy league education, and turning a blind eye when it&#039;s not convenient to do otherwise... So expect it to get much, much worse before it gets better.  My advice?  if you&#039;re living in poverty: ditch your home, get a gym membership, (so you have somewhere to bathe), and then live in your car--Preferably in a community with a college.  Work two jobs until you can afford to get an education, and don&#039;t take any more classes than what you can get straight A&#039;s in, and you&#039;ll be on full scholarship and/or working for a professor within 2-3 years.  After you have about 10 years experience in a credible field, start a business that will help change it all.  Aspiring actors/actresses do the &quot;live in your car&quot; thing all the time.  Do it with a couple families so daycare can happen for free.  

Change is never easy nor convenient... which is of course why it isn&#039;t happening.  Everyone should be ashamed of the mass complacency, I know I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drug companies have been extremely profitable because during the Reagan administration, legislation was passed that favored them, and the added wealth has enabled them to lobby aggressively for laws that are even more favorable to their economics, and no one has bothered to stop them.  There are whole books about this.<br />
The argument about drug companies needing big $$ for R&amp;D is of course made weak when you notice twice as much is spent on their advertising budget.  Scary, considering we are the only industrialized country that allows direct-to-consumer advertisement.  Which of course pressure on doctors because patients come in asking for the drug by name, and the doctor that doesn&#8217;t prescribe that may lose a customer.  As for Walmart, I doubt nepotism/ favoritism is an encouraged corporate policy, but low-price/discount type companies tend to pay little and therefore end up with poor management judgment, especially on a local level.  Same kind of thing can be found in fast food chains and so on.  I have no good advice for the people exploited by this scenario due to lack of other job options.  Pack up and move?  Easier said than done, of course.  Microsoft profits are irrelevant,  because when it comes to lower income families and &#8220;survival&#8221;, computer equipment has never been a necessity compared to drugs and food, and even gas to get to work.  Want online access?  Move near a town with a library with necessary resources that are free.  But again, easier said than done.  A completely corporate-owned government is becoming more a reality every day, but in the end, it&#8217;s our own fault because we are letting it happen by buying these products, electing any crook with an ivy league education, and turning a blind eye when it&#8217;s not convenient to do otherwise&#8230; So expect it to get much, much worse before it gets better.  My advice?  if you&#8217;re living in poverty: ditch your home, get a gym membership, (so you have somewhere to bathe), and then live in your car&#8211;Preferably in a community with a college.  Work two jobs until you can afford to get an education, and don&#8217;t take any more classes than what you can get straight A&#8217;s in, and you&#8217;ll be on full scholarship and/or working for a professor within 2-3 years.  After you have about 10 years experience in a credible field, start a business that will help change it all.  Aspiring actors/actresses do the &#8220;live in your car&#8221; thing all the time.  Do it with a couple families so daycare can happen for free.  </p>
<p>Change is never easy nor convenient&#8230; which is of course why it isn&#8217;t happening.  Everyone should be ashamed of the mass complacency, I know I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
