Type Size  -  +
December 14, 2007, 8:13 pm

Fortune’s 101 Dumbest Moments in Business

By Patsuris

It was the year of poisonous toothpaste and airline blunders galore. Fortune’s 101 Dumbest Moments in Business looks back at 2007’s highlights; if selling Prozac for dogs isn’t the height of madness, what is?

Tell us which Dumbest Moment shocked or amused you the most, and what kind of ergregious acts of idiocy you’ve witnessed where you work. The best replies will be published here.

Shame on you Apple. Refusing evaluate customers ideas.You will never have all the best ideas.

Posted By Stefano T., Kearny, NJ : April 1, 2008 8:38 am

Re: Best Buy - It doesn’t surprise me in the least that Best Buy would pull this kind of stunt. Best Buy employees have flat-out lied to me about their products and warranties. They will say anything and do anything to make the sale. Their customer service is very poor, to way the least. And if there is a problem afterwards, the corporate culture - right up to the store manager - seems to be, “No, we can’t help you with that.” After several very bad experiences, I will not shop at Best Buy under any circumstances. Instead I go to Costco, where they stand behind what they sell and solve problems with a smile.

Posted By Bob, Paradise, CA : March 21, 2008 4:12 pm

Fortune made a mistake by including the Radiohead download experiment as a dumb moment. The economics of the music industry are shady and the industry is notorious for the exploitation of its artists. In reality, Radiohead would have been lucky to get $1 per album sale through traditional distribution but instead got $6 by going direct to the consumer. Radiohead smartly avoided the padded fees for producing, packaging, marketing, and merchandising. By going direct to the consumer they avoided the typical inflated record company overhead costs. Money aside, there were other immeasurable benefits. Radiohead retained control to the rights to one of their best albums, generated good will with their fans, created free publicity in unlikely outlets like Fortune and introduced the band to people unfamiliar to the group. Terra Firma’s purchase of EMI would have made a better example for the article. Terra Firma and EMI are not only hurting from the departure of Radiohead and Paul McCartney, but it is also looking at the potential loss of other artists, such as Coldplay, to self publishing and independent labels.

Posted By tony, orlando,fl : February 10, 2008 3:28 am

After the Chinese Poisoned Pet Foot incident, I stopped buying manufactured dog food entirely and have never gone back. I simply make my own dog food, using a mixture of ground meat, plain white rice, and canned mixed vegetables. These ingredients can be purchased in bulk very cheaply and prepared in batches when I do my normal cooking. It is not a lot of extra work, it simplifies my shopping, and I have (slightly-)more confidence in the regulation of the human food supply than the pet food supply. I say everyone should boycott manufactured pet food!

Posted By Mike White Washington DC : February 6, 2008 6:14 pm

I previously thought the writers and editors of Fortune were actually business-minded. Lets break this down into point form for the pre-secondary school students writing for Fortune:
1. Radiohead decides to sell THEIR work for whatever price the buyer wants to pay.
2. Radiohead generates twice the amount of PROFITS than if they were to remain with a recording label.
3. Radiohead shifts the music-selling paradigm, so far infact, that other large musicians are following.

Wow . . . sounds horrible! What a mistake! I mean they should have remained pawns for a record label, settled for less money and lost their musical individuality.

Fortune’s article should be renamed to 102 Dumbest Moments in Business and they should place themselves in the number 1 spot for such absurdity.

Posted By Nat, Toronto Ontario, Canada : February 1, 2008 1:26 pm

If the rats didn’t die, we should be fine.

Posted By Jim, Minneapolis, Minnesota : January 11, 2008 3:08 pm

I hope the dog can get by on that amount!

Posted By Jim, Minneapolis, Minnesota : January 11, 2008 3:03 pm

I lost interest in buying a ToTo toilet when I found out it costs more to have one installed than the actual cost of the unit.

Posted By Pauline C Keitt, Austin, Texas : January 11, 2008 2:48 pm

RE: #35
According to PETA (website), there’s more to the M&M/ Mars story
“Got a sweet tooth? Think twice before picking up a Mars candy bar! You should know that candymaker Mars, Inc.—creator of M&M’s, Snickers, Twix, Dove, Three Musketeers, Starburst, Skittles, and other candies—funds deadly animal tests, even though there are more reliable human studies and not one of the tests is required by law.

Mars recently funded a deadly experiment on rats to determine the effects of chocolate ingredients on their blood vessels. Experimenters force-fed the rats by shoving plastic tubes down their throats and then cut open the rats’ legs to expose an artery, which was clamped shut to block blood flow. After the experiment, the animals were killed. Mars has also funded cruel experiments in which mice were fed a candy ingredient and forced to swim in a pool of a water mixed with white paint. The mice had to find a hidden platform to avoid drowning, only to be killed and dissected later on. In yet another experiment supported by Mars, rats were fed cocoa and anesthetized with carbon dioxide so that their blood could be collected by injecting a needle directly into their hearts, which can lead to internal bleeding and other deadly complications.”

Posted By Lauren Long Island, NY : January 11, 2008 2:44 pm

The lending institutions need to start beeing more efficient and accomodating in “short sales”. They take too long in processing, giving answers to offers and the end result is the avoidance of buyers and real estate agents for properties in preforeclosure.

Posted By Ersi, Orlando, Florida : January 8, 2008 6:30 pm

Regarding the Zamboni on the street. In Boise, Idaho, a couple of drunk employees of the ice rink drove the zamboni about a mile down the road to the all night Burger King. They were arrested, but they were convicted because they were driving a vehicle that was NOT street legal on a public street. Would have been the same with a 4 wheel off road vehicle, a snowmobile, etc.

Posted By Dan Lester, Boise, Idaho : January 8, 2008 3:10 pm

#48: The European Union - film trailer to promote that the EU supports film making in Europe. What’s dumb about this one? Pretty canny if you ask me, big organisation with a reputation for being faceless grey suits produces a funny clip that gets 5 million hits on youtube. Inspired rather than dumb. Maybe it’s a USA vs European sensibility issue, Americans get more easily upset by portrayals of sex?

Posted By Mark, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire : January 8, 2008 2:14 pm

Masterfoods’ decision to not use animal products in its chocolate seems like a smart business moment - not a dumb one.

Posted By Gerald Rey, Traverse City, MI : January 8, 2008 4:14 am

It seems sensationalistic to me to say the Rocawear jacket used “dog fur.” If it had been wolf fur, they wouldn’t have called it “dog fur,” and wolves are the same exact species as house dogs (Canis lupus). Raccoon dogs (which were used for the jackets) on the other hand, are a different species entirely (Nyctereutes procyonoides), and though distantly related to dogs, they look and act a lot like raccoons, hence the name. They’re also major pests, so even if it’s false advertising, it’s not like they were killing puppy dogs or an endangered species.

Posted By Eyedunno, Okaya-shi, Nagano-ken, Japan : January 6, 2008 10:27 am

date rape drug in toys!
what’s the big problem,the tobbaco industry has been getting away with this kind of stuff for years.

Posted By rus staller pa. : January 6, 2008 8:30 am

The Rocawear coat is marked “Raccoon dog.” That does not mean it’s made of puppies.

Raccoon dogs are definitely not dogs and not quite raccoons; they are animals that look a little like both.

If one is against all fur clothing on principle, this may sound pedantic.

However, an equally petty misunderstanding led to the pointless slaughter of felines when it was reported that SARS may have originated in “civet cats.”

Posted By David Brickle, Escondido CA : January 4, 2008 1:30 am

About the apple flop— what a flop indeed. I have to agree with fortune. Apple made themselves look like they were intimidated by a 9-year old girl who was actually thinking, and outspoken enough to write a letter. There aren’t many kids like that these days— she cared and went the extra mile to write to write a letter. Kudos to the kid and shame on Apple.

Posted By Michy, Atherton, California : January 3, 2008 1:12 pm

Get a life fortune! You guys are a bunch of idiots. So are your readers.

Posted By Anonymous : January 3, 2008 11:39 am

On 101 Dumbest Moments in Business, #1 - Recall of Chinese Products:

My “favorite” part of the Thomas recall was that after I mailed back my son’s lead-tainted toy trains, RC2 sent me (and hundreds of other parents) replacement trains that were ALSO lead-tainted. Then they recalled those!!!

I’ll never buy another Thomas train, but it’s impossible to avoid all products made in China, especially toys.

Posted By Christine, Washington DC : January 2, 2008 10:31 am

I have a slight problem with titling the number 1 dumbest moment in business, “China”. First, China did NOT force stupid Americans to buy their products. Second, go ahead boycott China and you will see prices go up on everything. Third, I suggest that the title be changed to Nike, California Health Department, Mattel, or whatever whomever you would like to blame, Fortune editors. Besides, can you ensure that everything USA exports are 100% safe? No. Look for another scapegoat. China is just the wrong country to mess with.

Posted By Anonymous : December 31, 2007 4:43 pm

Date Rape Drug in toy? I can’t help but feel that things like this ARE NOT ACCIDENTS. Are we victims of deliberate sabotage of products of certain manufacturers, or are the executives of our companies too dumb to do research on the standards for materials used in the products they order? Either way, SOMETHING JUST ”ISN’T RIGHT” ABOUT ALL THESE RECALLS.

Posted By Anne, Las Vegas, NV : December 31, 2007 1:48 pm

A PAYMENT LIKE TRIS IS A DISGRCE.
HOW CAN THIS HAPPEN WHEN THE COMPANY LOSY M0NE,.
O ONE IS WORTH THIS KIND OF PAYMRNT. UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES,

KEN FEHLIS

Posted By FLOWER MOUND, TEXAS : December 31, 2007 12:10 pm

Ironically, Verizon makes a choice not to allow text messages for a prochoice group and they are criticized. It is Verizon’s choice if they don’t want whatever content they deem unacceptable to be sent through their text messaging system. I just wish they would have stuck to their guns. I’m sure they would have been villified just as much as if they would have allowed a Pro-Life group (heaven forbid) to do the exact same thing, but thats what happens when the media is dominated by so called “liberals” who aren’t liberal at all, but people who claim to be “open minded” yet villify and try to crush any dissenting opinion that doesn’t fit in with their worldview.

Verizon you should have made your stand and stuck with instead of backing down.

Posted By Patrick McKenna, St. Louis MO : December 31, 2007 11:52 am

“According to The Wall Street Journal, his fellow bridge enthusiasts claim that (CEO James Cayne) Cayne sometimes smokes marijuana at the end of tournament sessions.”

SO WHAT!!! half of America secretly smokes a little marijuana. better than getting drunk like HBO President Chris Albrecht and punghing and choking your girl friend. Wake up America…lets legalize

Posted By larry wichita kansas : December 31, 2007 11:48 am

I THINK IT’S TIME FOR THE US TO START MAKING THERE OWN PRODUCTS EVEN IF IT COSTS MORE TO THE CONSUMERS. I BELIEVE AMERICANS WOULD PAY THE HIGHER PRICE FOR A TOY, KNOWING THAT IT WAS MADE IN THE GOOD OLD USA. CHINA SHOULD BE OUT.

Posted By BOBBI, BRIDGEWATER, NJ : December 31, 2007 10:41 am

Regarding WikiScanner: I don’t think it is a tech flop. As I understand it, it’s just a tool for finding out more about the location (and possibly the user) of a computer that is used to edit Wikipedia anonymously. That quite a few people have been found out to have been -shall we say- altering articles in a way that suits them, is a proof that this tool is rather useful.

Posted By Martin, Uithoorn, the Netherlands : December 31, 2007 6:52 am

I THINK EVERYONE SHOULD BE NUDE AT LEAST ON SUNDAY LESS LAUNDRY,FOR GOD SAKE IM SO SICK OF WASHING EVERYDAY.DRYING FOLDING HANGING UP PUTTING AWAY.SURE WOULD SAVE MONEY ALSO.CLOTHES LAUNDRY SOAP. FABRIC SOFTNER.DRYER SHEETS.THINK ABOUT IT

Posted By SLH HENDERSONVILLE N.C : December 31, 2007 1:33 am

First of all, about #40, wow.
I knew Disney had that whole hidden sex and drug references stuff going all, but harcore porn… wow

Also, for all of you who are wondering WHY we haven’t stopped China from brining in bad toys… most of our debt is money borrowed from China. So what do you think happen if we shut off their major export? Bingo. We want our money. Now.

Posted By Brittany, Columbus Ohio : December 31, 2007 1:01 am

The”We the people” of the USA are getting more stupid everyday for putting up with our Gov and Corp.America. Its your money “Stupid” Spend it as you want ! That is what they are after with NAFTA, Outsourcing and loss of factories . How you spend your and jobs, How you buy and spend allows this to happen. Your Vote for Clinton and politician’s helped a whole lot. You control the future,Your Future.

Posted By Al Smith - Visalia, Ca : December 30, 2007 11:11 pm

In 2008 I am checking country of origin of every item I buy. The fewer items made in China, the better. I am not shopping WalMart for that very reason. You even have to watch where the garlic you buy is from. I have noted fresh garlic from, of all places, CHINA, being sold at Sam’s Club and even our Army commissary. Let’s bring industry back to the USA in 2008.

Posted By Enid Emerson, Missouri : December 30, 2007 11:08 pm

102. Fortune reinforces the general cluelessness of good old ignorant US that still percieves the rest of the world as some kind of collection of themeparks.

Posted By Sin Trenton : December 30, 2007 7:56 am

You forgot Wal-Mart’s underwear for girls with the caption: “Who needs credit cards?” on the front.

Posted By Sharyn Essman, St. Louis, MO : December 30, 2007 12:29 am

I don’t know what was worse Doug Parker’s DUI or the pathetic damage control afterwards. If you get caught doing something out of charaecter, it is best to admit it and say as little as possible. Admitting past sins was not irrevelant but made a bad situation worse.

JetBlue’s other dumb moment It sponsorship of the DailyKos Convention. Did they not realize what they were getting into and that it would effect friendly image? I guess the Blue in the name means Blue state.

Posted By Margaret Queen Creek AZ : December 29, 2007 1:28 pm

With Radioheads inclusion in this list, fortune shows that it has no knowledge of the music industry whatsoever…

Posted By Melbourne : December 28, 2007 11:07 pm

Yeah, these lists are bait dangled to entice comments, and I’m taking the bait.

#59 — Radiohead’s “stupid” move netted them $3,000,000; as Thom Yorke puts it in the current issue of Wired, “more than we’ve made on all of our other albums combined.”

I’m guessing Fortune editors equated the 62% who took the album for free with a 62% shortfall in projected album revenue–an assumption so wrong on so many elementary levels I’m at a loss to explain it’s appearance in a (formerly?) premier financial periodical.

I don’t even like Radiohead, but come on, give the goofy Brits some credit for proactivity, or at least get your facts straight.

Posted By Anthony, Chattanooga TN : December 28, 2007 4:00 pm

Actually, a lot of people (including chefs) thought Ratatouille was one of the best movies about food ever made. Not sure how that qualified as a business blunder…?

Posted By Mark, Boston, MA : December 28, 2007 3:58 pm

Marie from Ca. has said it all. She is right on both on the China and illegals. My grandparents waited their turn to come here from Italy and learn to speak English right away as they wanted to work. I am so tired of trying to talk on the phone with some one who can barely speak English and then get upset with me because I can’t understand them.

Posted By Ashley Hill, bethesda, md. : December 28, 2007 3:33 pm

do your journalists even think before they type?

you’re supposed to be an AUTHORITY on big business, not a mockery of it. whoops.

Posted By jilm, bangkok, thailand : December 28, 2007 2:11 pm

J&J isn’t suing the American Red Cross for using that logo - J&J is suing the American Red Cross for TRYING TO SELL THE RIGHTS to use the lggo to J&J’s competitors. They can use the logo forever they just can’t legally profit from the logo since J&J owns the trademark.

Posted By Jessica, Philadelphia, PA : December 28, 2007 1:58 pm

when are we going to see that our countrys wasy from the past, the ones that set us abovre the other countries is slipping away. We are the FOOLS of the international community these days and it is because we still buy from countries that try to take advantage of us over and over again. Thank heavens I will be dead soon.

Posted By Lenny, ny. ny. : December 28, 2007 1:19 pm

Radiohead’s Dumbest Moment in Business?

You’re writing, sixty percent didn’t pay anything - and 38% percent paid an average of 6 bucks. I happen to be one of the 38% of people who willingly paid - not because I think Radiohead needs the money (they don’t) but because here’s a band that understands the new economy better than Fortune magazine.
The one thing left to say is that Radiohead was probably making more money from this than if it had gone through the usual channels. The only thing left to do is to change your text as follows:

58. Fortune magazine
Fortune magazine decides to name Radiohead’s decision to sell MP3 on their own website, where every user has to sign up - thus creating a huge user base - a dumb business moment for Radiohead. Fortune doesn’t realize that the joke’s on them because everyone else understands the significants of this move. Meanwhile, Radiohead is changing singlehandedly the music distribution business by collecting donations and contact information directly from their fans. The proceeds are most likely more than what Radiohead could have made had they gone through the usual music distribution channels.

Posted By Urs Gubser, New York, NY : December 28, 2007 12:38 pm

58. Radiohead
Can’t wait for the follow-up album, ‘In Debt’

Considering most record contracts give only $1 a sale to band, getting an average of $2.26 means they made more than twice per alblum. Increasing your per unit return by double is only a dumb business move if they cut their total sales in half, which the Forbes blurb doesnt even mention.

Posted By Xwal, Indianapolis, IN : December 28, 2007 11:29 am

Fortune’s #1 Dumbest Moment in Fortune Top 101 Lists.

oops.

Posted By Kieran Huggins, Toronto, Ontario : December 28, 2007 11:18 am

hmmm…Maybe Fourtune should list itself here. Where is 101?

Posted By Carson, Richmond VA : December 28, 2007 11:10 am

Now you see why a merger between comcast and Walt D won’t work. Kids should always come first before porn fans.

Posted By Alberto C., Bronx, NY : December 28, 2007 10:42 am

Seems like a no-brainer to me!
Stop making things in China!
Plently of US folks looking for jobs!

Posted By Bev Koch, North Versailles, Pa : December 28, 2007 10:25 am

Re: Radiohead.

Are you people retarded? Radiohead earned $3 million in one month with their download plan, not a penny of which they had to share with a label. How is that dumb?

Posted By Buzz, Aurora, IL : December 28, 2007 9:59 am

Hey Stanley O’Neil and Chuck Prince; Why don’t you two coauthor a book. You could title it: “How to Ruin a Perfectly Good Fortune 500 Company and Get Rich While Doing it”. I’m sure there is a long line of of would-be exec’s who would buy the book. Shame on both of you!

Posted By Marietta, GA : December 28, 2007 7:44 am

It’s pretty clear that Merrill Lynch executive Jeffrey Edwards is either dishonest or asleep at the switch (or possibly both).

Posted By Marietta, GA : December 28, 2007 7:37 am

Here’s another dumb moment - Fortune’s 101 Dumbest Moments in Business features 100, not 101 moments.

100 and 101 both feature Maria Bartiromo

Posted By Luis Cruz, Philippines : December 27, 2007 10:47 pm

Radiohead actually made an average of just over $2 from selling their album themselves, whereas they would have made just $1 per album if they had gone through the record companies. So the decision is actually a pretty sound one business wise. You’d think Fortune would know that.

Posted By Matthew, LA, California : December 27, 2007 10:38 pm

“Sixty-two percent, according to comScore, decide to pay nothing, while the other 38% voluntarily fork over an average of six bucks.”

How about including the best part of the equation: How much Radiohead, THE ARTIST, keeps out of the gross sales of this album (100%?) versus how much A RECORD COMPANY would give them ($0.03 per CD?)

The only stupid people in this story are the record companies, whose greed is exceeded only by their incompetence.

Posted By Walter A., Miami, FL : December 27, 2007 8:06 pm

is it just me or are a bunch of the links pointed incorrectly?

Posted By nathan, la crosse WI : December 27, 2007 2:17 pm

OVERCOMPENSATED, UNDERPERFORMING DO NOTHING PARASITE.
HOW ABOUT THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE BOARD MEMBERS WHO APPROVE THESE DEALS?
WHAT IS THIER TAKE (ACTUALLY AND FIGURATIVELY ) ON THESE DEALS

Posted By AMBROSE CHICAGO IL : December 27, 2007 10:42 am

It’s too bad this did come out a few weeks later, it could have included our brainiac CEO Al Lord and his stellar performance on the shareholders call last Wednesday. Stunning.

Posted By Tab Urasa, Indianapolis, In : December 27, 2007 10:38 am

Here’s a suggestion to add to the list of dumb business ideas:

A HUNDRED PAGE slide show, instead of a list.
It all but guarantees that no one will bother with the entire story. On the chance that it IS on the list, I apologize. I don’t have all day to click through 100 pages.

Posted By Ted Bell, Beverly Hills Ca. : December 27, 2007 2:04 am

TOTOs’ are overpriced and have quality issues. Look into IZEN bidets. These guys know what they are doing and even manufacture for Samsung. I have two in my home and has tons of features more than TOTO. Other companies “claim” to be manufactured in Japan or Korea but most of them are just cheap made-in-china-knock-offs try to sell at high-end prices. Thats what happens when consumers dont do their research.

Posted By Tom Clammor, Richmond, VA : December 26, 2007 8:51 pm

It seems clear after only reading your Top 9 that you have no more than 10 items that really deserve inclusion on this list. Ratatouille was excellent and deserved Kudos. Many of your top 10 can be lumped into a “sub prime nightmare” category. this is gimmicky journalism and I expect more from Money and CNN.

Posted By Leah Los Angeles, CA : December 26, 2007 8:39 pm

Be careful with Comcast while you close their account and also when you start. Because as soon as you start their phone service you will get calls from various companies kindof spam or
deceit. One i know is Family Readers Service they will say they will send you a gift probably diamond watch and to verify your identity give your debit card or bank account etc.
As soon as you give this information their language tone will change and they will inform you that they will be sending you bla bla magzines to you and dedeuct 1000 times cost of mags from your account. And they will actually do it. Be careful !!!!!!

Posted By Robert Gerlad, NY : December 26, 2007 4:43 pm

Anyone else notice that there are only 100 of the dumbest moments in business in the article. Perhaps mistake 101 is Fortune not being able to count?

Posted By James Green, Provo Utah : December 26, 2007 3:09 pm

Shame, Shame, Shame- Shame on the toy company, shame on the media. I happen to work in sourcing products from China, and I can attest to the fact every US company that does business in China has QC (quality control) people inside the China factories whenever something is produced. Especially ANY company that sells product for children, their liability is just too GREAT as it should be. So we have an issue where some bad products were shipped into the US, the toy company puts all the blame on the factory and the sub contractors. What a shame, this company knew EXACTLY what they were shipping, exactly they would not take a risk to leave it in the hands of the Chinese. The Chinese are tireless workers as they strive to have all the luxuries etc this world has to offer, but they cannot be held to the same quality standards the US is accustomed to, that’s what the QC is for, that’s the check and balance, and it works, in this case the ONLY blame should be squarely put on the toy company, they are the balance, to bad there was no check……

Posted By Danny, High Point NC : December 26, 2007 2:07 pm

Some dogs do need prozac for specific things — my dog was severely abused (she was hit with shovels and burned) and is afraid of almost everything. Her depression pills have helped so much with her recovery. Also, I had a Bullmastuff with such bad separation anxiety that he chewed his crate up, then the door knob to the house. He let himself out and was hit by a car.
I’m all for prozac for dogs.

Posted By Sarah, Falls Village, CT : December 26, 2007 1:06 pm

In what universe is Radiohead’s download offer a dumb business move? Even by your math, 38% at an avg of $6 represents much more per record to the band than even the best major-label deals. And that’s not even considering the context of the move within the band’s career - this only solidifies and deepens their core fan base, keeping them relevant and vital to future ticket and download sales.

That’s the problem with ‘dumbest’ lists - karma’s a bitch and you can make yourself look dumb in the process, Fortune.

Posted By Mark R, Portland OR : December 26, 2007 12:28 pm

Shouldn’t the Fed’s go after a Stanley O’Neal to get most of his $161 mil back to pay for any repairs to the Mortgage mess? Better it come from Stan than from my tax dollars - my bonus this year is only $5,000 and I didn’t ruin anybodies lives by doing my job….

Posted By Lawrence, Minot SD : December 26, 2007 12:12 pm

Bear Stearns CEO James Cayne is not only a poor executive but he is also a crappy role model for America’s youth. I think he would be shot had he practiced his trade in China.

Posted By GRB, Denver, CO : December 26, 2007 10:20 am

Masterfoods (re-named Mars since September 2007) did not decide not to begin, they decided to stop using animal products in their various chocolate ranges once the vegetarian society in the UK caught them out and pointed out to them that they stood to lose 3 million customers in the UK alone.

Posted By Adam Pi, Lower Saxony, Germany. : December 26, 2007 9:13 am

It’s all well, fine, and good to talk about the problems created by the enormous population of obese people (Disney needs to deepen its water channels for the “It’s a Small World” ride to keep boats from getting stuck - and gives food coupon to patrons too large to ride.) This year I’ve read about this problem in multiple forms: airline seats are too small, nurses can’t move obese patients, and stronger hospital beds to hold larger patients are needed. Every time I go grocery shopping I see morbidly obese people riding in electric powered carts with baskets… supplied by the store. When is someone going to wake up and say, “We have a behavioral problem here!” - instead of deepening the water channels at Disney World? Even bariatric surgeons aren’t interested in the behavioral aspects of obesity! They’ll re-engineer your entire digestive system and then blame the (many) patients who regain weight for not following “protocol”… if they could do that why would they need the surgery in the first place?

Posted By Kelley McCabe, Vero Beach, FL : December 26, 2007 4:53 am

Don’t blame the Chinese for there stupidity,they do what there told.The real culprits are greedy corperate America and the US government who made these deals with the communists.
The fact is you can’t buy any item made in China thats worth the box it came in.But now thanks to the government were left with no alternative since americans con no longer produce a pair of shoe laces.

Posted By Frank Rhodes Lady Lake FL : December 25, 2007 10:41 am

I think you mean that Meredith Whitney’s husband is former WWE Champion John Bradshaw Leyfield

Posted By JAM Renaissance, Dallas TX : December 25, 2007 3:46 am

There are a lot of terrible entries on this list. Maybe whoever decided that this was a decent list to publish online should be added to the list?

Posted By Austin, Des Moines, Iowa : December 25, 2007 1:58 am

Fortune should consider being politiacally correct in posting the Imus article, “say what?” appears a bit racey to me!

Posted By K. English, New Baltimore, MI : December 24, 2007 10:53 pm

Re:Airline Snafus.Say what about hooters and Southwest Airlines and
Virgin Air?

Posted By Elizabeth Douglass,Columbia,Missouri : December 24, 2007 4:27 pm

I love how NorCals consistently defend terrible customer appreciation by a particular NorCal company using legalistic gobblety gook. Apple has a well-earned reputation for great marketing, lousy customer relations. Go Intel - at least you appreciate my business!

Posted By Nash, Vienna VA : December 24, 2007 12:36 am

We imprison the wrong people in this country.

Posted By Tim Coogan, Carterville, IL : December 23, 2007 11:02 pm

Still another example of an overpaid executive doing his job.

Posted By M. DePaiva, Issaquah, WA : December 23, 2007 10:46 am

The Red Cross should be the one suing. It started using the Red Cross symbol at least 20 years before Johnson & Johnson was founded. I guess those overpaid executives of the company need to justify their salaries somehow.

Posted By M. DePaiva, Issaquah, WA : December 23, 2007 10:43 am

It’s heart warming to see this mom has her priorities straight.

Posted By M. DePaiva, Issaquah, WA : December 23, 2007 10:34 am

I don’t see what P&G is complaining about. This should help sell more of their brushes.

Posted By M. DePaiva, Issaquah, WA : December 23, 2007 10:31 am

Some time ago I made a concious decision to not fly anywhere unless forced too. I live in the Ft. Worth Texas area and drive to any location in Texas as well as the contiguous states. I absolutely cannot stand the TAS folks, not to mention the airlines personal. Just makes me mad thinking about it. Security issues I can understand but the attitudes are more than I can take. I would never in a million years let airlines people treat me the way they do away from the airport. If you speak up or complain you are in big trouble. I have seen it happen. So I say the HECK with them.

Posted By James Dickason,Weatherford, Texas : December 21, 2007 4:12 pm

Golly, I wonder why American business is in the toilet???

Posted By Mark, San Diego, CA : December 21, 2007 3:40 pm

“In fact, many of our employees go on to be McBrain Surgeons”. I had to respond to number 67 on your list. I believe McDonald’s is correct in opposing the definition of “McJob”. As a teenager putting himself through school, I appreciated the opportunity to work for McDonald’s. No, it wasn’t my long term career choice, and no I may not have become a brain surgeon, but I am working in the hi-tech field developing alot of the equipment that is currently allowing your website to reach the world. And happily earning 6 figures. So don’t knock fast food jobs. One may very well be the stepping stone to a rewarding career.

Posted By Tom, Ottawa, Canada : December 21, 2007 11:17 am

Merrill Lynch under O’Neil pushed heavy into the subprime backed SIV’s etc despite all their old employee’s says it’s a bad idea. They laid off/got rid of the older employees who refused to ‘go along” with bad ideas. Now Merril Lynch is suffering their just losses. The fact that Merril paid 161m to get rid of their boss just says how dumb and desparate they are.

Posted By Anita Brain, Cleveland, Ohio : December 21, 2007 11:14 am

On Apple rejecting unsolicited suggestions:

This is a standard practice, since the sender may have hit on something Apple is already working on, and that sender would therefore be likely to complain when “his/her idea” suddenly gets announced and he/she doesn’t get credit ($$$). The entertainment industry, music companies, TV shows, all sorts of people use this system to avoid such problems.

If Apple leaves themselves “open” to new ideas, they leave themselves “OPEN” to nuisance lawsuits.

Posted By Bob Clayton Silver Spring, MD : December 21, 2007 11:12 am

What is wrong with Le Monde touting Ratatouille? It was an animated film, a fantasy! The message of the movie, however, was very heartening in the light of the celebrity chef craze.

Gastronomic is defined as “the art or science of good eating”. Le Monde was likely commenting on how the movie positively portrays the art of cooking to a level of passion on par with any other art, such as painting or sculpture. The premise that the main character is a rat is merely a play on the name of a common dish in French cuisine, ratatouille, which also happens to be part of the final flourish for the resolution of the story.

Sorry Fortune, you missed the point on this one.

Posted By Eric, Renton WA : December 21, 2007 11:00 am

Hey Branson and Playboy who is next Britney’s kid sister?

Posted By GA, LA, Ca : December 21, 2007 10:26 am

Two comments…one from each side as nobody gets off scott free on this one…Kyla Ebbert is a floozie who showed her true colors by posing in the nude for Playboy so ’nuff said about her…on the other hand the gate agents (and others) at Southwest are (I think) getting a little too “power mad” with their notariety on the A&E show “Airline”, which is all about SWA experiences at various airports. I have never run into a truly surley SWA agent but I must admit the airline is not nearly as friendly as they once were…and I fly then ALOT!

Posted By Jim - Naperville, IL : December 21, 2007 9:55 am

Just how is the fact that the Saudi Prince bought his own jumbo jet an “airline snafu”?

That doesn’t have anything to do with any airline operations and the guy can do whatever he wants with his money. If he want’s to buy his own plane and can afford to do it (and he certainly can), there’s nothing wrong with that.

Posted By Gilbert, Smyrna, TN : December 21, 2007 8:16 am

When are you people going to realize. No Shoes, no shrit, NO SERVICE. Airlines have the same type of rules. These companies are private buisnesses and this one in particular is a family discount airline. I know I would not want my children to read this shirt until they were at least the age were they understood it.

Posted By Aaron, Houston, Texas : December 21, 2007 6:16 am

Okaaayyyy.. So US rag “Fortune” puts China at the top of its dumb list. Hmmmm, we know China is gonna be the next superpower and a teeny little rag like Fortune won’t make a difference. A shame they didn’t realise it before they made themselves look bitter and foolish.

Posted By Joe, Sheffield, UK : December 20, 2007 9:34 pm

About the sacrifice of 2 goats by Nepal Airlines officials to appease the Hindu god of sky protection: That ranks right up there with the Governor of Georgia leading a prayer meeting to ask for rain! That story should also be in this list!

Posted By Petra Schoep, Tamarindo, Costa Rica : December 20, 2007 6:37 pm

The company president for the high-tec toilet shouldn’t be too upset about his product igniting. Thsoe toilets were made for small Japanese people, not the obese hogs of America

Posted By RB LA, CA : December 20, 2007 4:48 pm

ok if a lady leaves $12 million to a DOG after shes gone…..???…wow!

Posted By Mariam A. ,west paterson.nj : December 20, 2007 4:30 pm

Why is the ATHF promo a flop? Because 99% of the public is too stupid to recognize a sign made of LEDs? When was the last time you saw a bomb made of a thin circuit board and LEDs? Come on, the only flops here is an ignorant and paranoid public.

Posted By Doug, Dallas, TX : December 20, 2007 4:27 pm

Regarding the Intel ad….

I think it’s only an issue if you see people for their race instead of seeing us all as humans. I didn’t even notice the “issue” until you point it out. Intel is only try to sell the idea that their product is fast. So what if the athletes are black.

Posted By Jon, Walnut Creek CA : December 20, 2007 4:14 pm

I guess Disneyland Execs have a keen sense of marketing and PR. What will they do next? Hey I know..Why not prevent our employees from living accross the street from the Park. We will sue the City to prevent the construction of a new low-income housing complex. I wonder if Disney has any opennings in these two depts????

Posted By Manuel J Herrera L A CA : December 20, 2007 3:58 pm

How about IBM not getting the Licensing for the Disk Oerating system from Bill and Paul when they were finished with their contract? They could have bought them out for mayber a couple million.

Posted By Richard, Holland PA. : December 20, 2007 3:53 pm

Let’s not forget that the authorities who mistook the ATHF promos for bombs didn’t notice them for several days and attempted to distract the public from their pathetic incompetence. Way to go, knuckleheads.

Posted By Anonymous : December 20, 2007 3:14 pm

84. Southwest Airlines

This article fails to point out that Ms. Ebbert flashed her panties on the Today show when she sat down and crossed her legs. No telling what she did on the aircraft. And her being hired by Playboy says it all.

Posted By Steve, Nampa Idaho : December 20, 2007 3:09 pm

So a German screw factory shuts down the red light district in Amsterdam?
(article no.49) This is funny! Are you sure you got the geography right?

Posted By Darine, Perpignan, France : December 20, 2007 2:57 pm

I think the #1 dumbest moment award should definitely go to Time Warner for shutting down the highly regarded Business 2.0 magazine which started this list in the first place!

Posted By Mike Fanara, San Diego, CA : December 20, 2007 2:26 pm

Regarding Apple’s letter to the person sending unsolicited ideas :

This is not dumb - this is actually sound business judgement on the part of Apple.
No wonder the letter came from the legal department. The risk that they were trying to mitigate is that the sender may later sue Apple for Intellectual Property rights if one of their ideas did make it into iPod, possibly by Apple’s own inventions and enhancements. It would be a legal nightmare to differentiate who owns the “IP” in such cases. So it was a prudent response from Apple after all.

Posted By Shobhan, Cupertino, CA : December 20, 2007 2:14 pm

I love when you do this each year, one of my favorite things to read!

Posted By Brandy, Atlanta Georgia : December 20, 2007 2:13 pm

What’s wrong with the Year of the Rat, way to offend Chinese Culture!

Posted By Jen, NY, NY : December 20, 2007 1:42 pm

Pilot Travel Centers implimented a security program to help prevent use of stolen cards at their gas pumps, and probably receive a better rate from credit card companies. The system requires customers to enter their card’s billing zip code when making a purchase of gasoline using ‘pay at the pump’. Unfortunatley Pilot failed to test their system, which used slow responding heat sensitive non-tacit keypads, and software that require entry of a zip code in a few seconds - too fast for most customers having to use the quirky keypads. No idea of how many customers went elsewhere to buy gas, and how much sales were lost before Pilot finally started to fix the problems after several months.

Posted By Ed, Brogue, PA : December 20, 2007 12:53 pm

Move by Apple’s legal counsel is certainly not dumb, but had to what is needed to protect the company’s intellectual rights. This is a very standard practice that many companies follow. Just because it is from a nine year old, does not necessarily mean a company needs to encourage it.

Posted By Rad, annandal, virginia : December 20, 2007 12:47 pm

Without question, the dumbest business moment in history came when IBM decided not to bother programming its computers and sub-contracted to young Bill Gates. That decision cost IBM billions and billions (as the late Dr. Sagan would say).

Posted By Ed Prior, Poquoson VA : December 20, 2007 12:02 pm

As for the adult swim Aqua Teen Hunger Force add, i personally thought it was great! I blame not the company, but the hundreds of people with no sense of humor and who are scared of their own shadow apparently who thought this was a bomb. Come on people, when was the last time you saw a report that read “Well, we knew it was a bomb, because it flicked us off”. I call this moment instead a “Dumb fear driven American Society” moment rather than a dumb business moment.

Posted By Heather, Atlanta Ga : December 20, 2007 11:59 am

Radiohead made the same profit from downloads that they would have received from a record label distribution … $2-$3 per album … that’s a wash and they cut out the middlemen.

besides … the money will be in the support tour … which Radiohead also controls completely now.

buy tickets for a concert lately ?

Dylan and The Band, 1974 … $18

Posted By L J Burgess, Kennedyville, Md : December 20, 2007 11:53 am

For the “Aqua Teen Hunger Force” adds, the authorities are really the ones with egg on their face. When was the last time a terrorist made a bomb with a large “Light Bright” cartoon image as if to say, “Look, here’s a bomb”. Funny that they did this in several states, but only a couple panicked and overreacted. Of course, the media had a field day with it.

Posted By John Sequal, Albany NY : December 20, 2007 11:50 am

Good on Apple for telling everyone that they don’t accept unsolicited ideas. That’s brilliant!!! What if they accepted her idea, ran with it, and it is a big success? In this country’s screwed up court systems, she could probably sue for $50 billion dollars for Apple’s theft of her idea. Way to cover your own ass Apple!! Brilliant business misinterpreted by idiot people!

Posted By Robert Wong, Chandler, AZ : December 20, 2007 11:42 am

D.R. Horton, the homebuilder who said the entire year of 2007 will suck should not be on this list. It is one of the few honest statements I have ever heard from any businessman!
Tom Praska
Minnetonka, Minnesota

Posted By Tom Praska- Minnetonka, Minnesota : December 20, 2007 11:37 am

Sallie Mae CEO Al Lord for his remark “Lets get the f___ out of here” while being recorded. Perhaps he can get in his Porsche (parked in front of SLM headquaters)to make his exit.

Posted By Richard @ Washington, DC : December 20, 2007 11:27 am

Stanley O’Neal is, obviously, a criminal. Only a criminal takes his pay after being responsible for a gargantuan, and the first, loss in the company’s nearly 75 year history. He should be ostracized, reviled and held up to ridicule.

Posted By scottweible : December 20, 2007 11:11 am

To DAWG in GA, Jim Samples did resign, however he did not face criminal charges in the matter. Turner broadcasting paid $2 million to the city of Boston in order to absolve themselves and their affiliates of any legal ramifications. The fact that he resigned is immaterial to my point. No one ever talked about charging him or any of his colleagues after the city received $2 million. They did however continue to prosecute the college students who actually deployed the devices. Resignation is a private matter within the company. I’m concerned with the fair and impartial application of JUSTICE, which is not present under these circumstances. If a judge had adjudicated the case and fined TBS and TCN $2 Million, then okay, but this amounts to a preemptive bribe which circumvents our judicial system. Please DAWG, try to pay attention to the point before you start yapping.

Posted By Mark, Baltimore, MD : December 20, 2007 10:59 am

Any of you who are complaining about loss of US manufacturing jobs should realize that it is not just wasteful executives who have caused this problem. A greater share of blame should be laid at the doorstep of trade unions that drive up salaries and benefits in good times, then bankrupt companies when production blossoms in foreign markets. International competition is the NATURAL progression. Isolationist policies are what got us into messes like WWI. They also hold back domestic economies from running efficiently by limiting imports of affordable raw materials and parts.

Countries follow a clear progression: first you’re agricultural, then you’re industrial, then you’re service based. The US is quickly moving into the third arena while China is going full tilt into the second. Consumers just like you demand low prices, then whine when US workers lose their jobs. What did you expect would happen? That we would have the same number of steel-mill workers for the next 100 years? EVERYBODY KNOWS HOW TO MAKE STEEL. If you’re an auto maker, buy the cheapest one you can find that meets your requirements. It is a tragedy that people get laid off; no doubt about it. People who are in these industries should realize that they are going to need another trade skill to succeed in the 21st century. Working at the same car plant your daddy did is a relic of the over-regulated, protectionist past. Granted, our government has done a piss-poor job of regulating product safety, but it’s not impossible. Look how quickly Japan puts the clamp on US beef at even a hint of mad-cow disease.

I can have some sympathy for workers out of a job, but complaining about foreign displacement of jobs, then failing to boycott foreign products is hypocrisy of the highest order. If you feel there are no domestic alternatives, stop complaining and start your own company. I imagine you will find it hard to compete, but that just plays into your argument doesn’t it? It’s also pretty crass to let your heart bleed for workers in the US, but scream about Chinese labor prices while those very jobs are lifting people in rural China out of the destitution inflicted on them by the insanity of communism. What makes the quality of their lives less than that of an American? Oh right, I forgot. They’re not Americans…those lives are worth way more. USA! USA! USA! Sick.

Posted By Tony, Austin, TX : December 20, 2007 10:55 am

DON MCDONALD OF INTEL Needs to lose his job.

Posted By Harsha : December 20, 2007 10:53 am

CBS letting Howard Stern leave for Sirius is one of the dumbest moments in business. They lost billions in revenue overnight.

Posted By Zoltan, Seattle WA : December 20, 2007 10:34 am

Surely the real Dumb Moment for the Ratatouille film was the decision made by Disney/Pixar that the public was too stupid to pronounce the word Ratatouille, without also spelling phonetically on posters, etc.

Posted By David, London, UK : December 20, 2007 10:32 am

The President of Cartoon Network — Jim Samples — resigned because this stunt. So MARK in BALTIMORE… the “higher ups”
did pay a price. Do your homework before you spout off.

Posted By Dawg GA : December 20, 2007 10:00 am

Ratatouille was amazing. 4.5 stars on Google movies, 8.5/10 on IMDB. Have the authors even seen it?

Posted By Phillip, Minneapolis, MN : December 20, 2007 9:01 am

About Dumb Moment - Johnson & Johnson sues the American Red Cross for infringement of its trademarked red cross.

Should Johnson & Johnson win the case tehn I suppose the U.S is left with the other sign, the Red Crescent - unless J&J has already registered that also. The U.S is still the wild west where J&J shoots from hip.

Posted By Mr A Nykanen, Helsinki, Finland : December 20, 2007 7:48 am

With regards to #61, its worth noting that the business about eating the goats innards have been proven to be a false rumour. The guests were given Greek meat soup that was in no way related to the goat decoration. That doesn’t change the fact that using a dead goat (purchased from a butcher) on the dinner table is rather grotesque, but its generally a good idea to clarify these things.

Posted By S Schulze, Melbourne, Australia. : December 19, 2007 11:07 pm

We all know the majority of the recalls were due to flaws in designs not done in China. (such as tiny magnets and etc…). It’s so frustrating to see the media always choose to see one-side of the story to make the point, especially when it comes to China.

Posted By David, CO : December 19, 2007 7:08 pm

I am been a TV repair man for 37 years,and never in my life I saw so much garbage coming from China I am talking about the televisions,many of them end up on land field after 6 months to a year because quality is not there any more,parts to repair this sets sometimes are more expensive that the set itself,China found a gold mine on us.-Tito

Posted By Heriberto Paredes,Saint Anthony-Idaho : December 19, 2007 5:56 pm

Re: #9

So who exactly are you commenting on?
Pixar? Ratatouille is in the top 50 all-time highest grossing films (worldwide).
Le Monde? For giving a U.S. movie a good review?
Fortune? We didn’t have enough to complain about so we started randomly pulling things out of a hat?

Posted By S. Jobs (no relation), San Diego, CA. : December 19, 2007 5:55 pm

China sure promises cheap products but offers zero quality. They are number 1 in imitation but last in imagination.

Posted By Sunny, New York City, New York : December 19, 2007 4:04 pm

#83

Her husband isnt called “Death Mask” in the WWE (and may not have been for a few decades) he uses his real name John Layfield and they play up his other roles as a FoxNews corespondent.

Posted By Xwal, Indy, IN : December 19, 2007 3:44 pm

Regarding smart toilets or your perspective in general…it is way to US focused…do any of your staff travel…from Paulson being outsmarted by the Chinese to the Koreans laughing at us becuase we use toilet paper…better take off your US centric hat…the WORLD is changing and we are not the only culture in town…your statement about the smart toilets indicates just how unsophisticated you are…

Posted By Jim, Carlsbad, CA : December 19, 2007 3:40 pm

Radiohead allegedly made more money from this release than from all other albuns combined, says the band leader in a interview to Wired posted… today. Also, this note shows Fortune wasn’t fair on the assessment. .comStore also said that the 38% that paid for the album paid $6 average, so in fact the band profitted $ 3 million with the online version only. Why didn’t you post the full information? Probably the intern didn’t read it in full. Hmmmm, seems there’s already material for the dumbest moments in journalism for 2008!

Posted By Eduardo, Brazil : December 19, 2007 2:47 pm

Regarding the Toto Toilet.

Where can you get on a Hot Seat and really get a charge out of it all at the same time?

At least it is nothing you have to eat out of!

Remember people? It was this administration that did not fund enough for the US Product and Safety Agency.
Some corporations are running rampant and not taking responsibility for suppliers because it is too costly.
Their Risk Managment Departments weigh the penalty costs versus corporate gains.
Low and behold which side wins?

Look at corporate pension funds moved to the government agency responsibility with payback to workers at a lower amount than promised by the corporate raiders.
But those same companies, some of them, use bankruptcy to reorganize, at taxpayers expense, and return to the marketplace with more competitiveness to pay some of their CEOs up to 34 Million Dollars compensation.
And guess what our representatives are doing?? Hmm! Nothing? I don’t see voluntary return of Pensions Plans to companies that reorganize under Chapter 11?
Enron employees suffered greatly and the Execs walked away with millions to be donated to the Administration political representatives and was one of the largest campaign donators, if not the largest!
I don’t see recalls for donations to a campaign committee from Enron???
I guess it is Big Friendly Corporate Business as usual!
Check it out?

So where the problem really lie?
Again, the finger pointing should be at our Congress lack of responsiveness and the blame is wide spread includes the US Citizen complacency. Understand how our government works and you will realize why it has work very well recently.

There is a system.

Use it or lose it! The negative forces out there Love complacency!
It is earned not given!

Posted By Al.City of Industry,CA : December 19, 2007 2:38 pm

I understand you’re all money-grubbing Capitalists, but I can’t believe Radiohead is actually on there. Their intention was to make a point rather than to rake in any cash. But of course, none of you would understand that.

Also, Titanic watch is a brilliant idea.

Posted By Disgruntled Reader, A Town In, Massachusetts : December 19, 2007 2:34 pm

The store Master Bate and Tackle does exist in East Haven Ct. on Main st.

Posted By Thomas Boston, Ma. : December 19, 2007 2:06 pm

Radiohead actually probably made MORE money by selling their album that way.

Artists only tend to get less than $2 on any 10$ album anyway so getting $6 is a big improvement. Chances are a lot of the Free downloaders were those who would have never bought it without trying first (like me), some of whom likely went back and paid a second time, those who would have downloaded it illegally and those who downloaded it multiple times in different locations.

Posted By Ieuan, Port Talbot, UK : December 19, 2007 1:55 pm

Thomas has been a failure every where he has been since he stopped playing.

Posted By Malcolm Peters. Saint John N B : December 19, 2007 1:51 pm

china should not be able to export anything to the US. We are obligated to protect our people and should under not circumstances accept any of their lead contained products or food. This is nuts that we are still importing. Are we that desprite for cheaper products that we would endanger our lives, especially the children who are too young to speak for themselves.

Posted By Lynn Sperano, Canandaigua New York : December 19, 2007 1:32 pm

In a perfect world, we would not have been spending the last fifty years selling America. I cannot find anything we actually manufacture in the USA anymore. Not even Levis or L.L. Bean products. I’m sick of it. Our workers are out of jobs and we have to put up with third class merchandise at first class prices.

Posted By Ginni Galloway N.J. : December 19, 2007 1:31 pm
Posted By CC, NY : December 19, 2007 1:25 pm

Why would you include Radiohead in this list? Between people who paid for the download, people who bought the $84 box set (including me) and people planning to purchase the CD next month, this will likely be the most profitable release they’ve ever had.

Posted By Frank, Buffalo, NY : December 19, 2007 1:03 pm

How about General Motors taking a 39 billion dollar write down on a company that only has a 15 billion dollar market capitalization?

Or, how about Daimler AG paying 36 billion for Chrysler in 1998 and then paying 680 million to get rid of it less than 10 years later?

Or, how about the Fed looking the ohter way on sub prime loans because it was good for the economy?

Or maybe how having a negative book value doesn’t send you into bankruptcy but instead puts you in the ‘Fortune’ 500.

Welcome to the ‘new economy’ built on debt where all you need is cash flow and audacity to be ’successful’.

Profits and a balance sheet in the black are so quaint.

Posted By David Fox lake, WI : December 19, 2007 12:58 pm

Regarding #59 Radiohead:
Was it also one of the dumbest moments in business when Google held a modified Dutch auction to launch their IPO which in many ways is similar to what Radiohead is doing here? Not according to a 2004 Fortune article entitled, “Two Cheers For The Google Ipo.”
So, let me get this right: When the market decides the valuation of common stock, that’s the best thing since sliced bread. Yet for some reason, when the market is asked to bear out a price for music, that’s dumb.
Your lack consistency is astounding.

Regarding #9 Ratatouille:
Dumb? It drove my wife and me to seek out local French restaurants and explore more diverse cuisine in our area. It also had us in the kitchen cooking that same day! Stick to what you guys do best - you’re obviously not movie critics!

Posted By Sam C, Raleigh, NC : December 19, 2007 12:52 pm

#51. Here’s the real problem, the issue with Apple actually happened in 2006, not 2007… Fact checking isn’t that tough.

Posted By Kenny, Dover, DE : December 19, 2007 12:39 pm

Best Dumb Business Move:

(1) Create a list that might be the only exposure people get to Fortune Magazine all year.

(2) Leave the impression, from the choices and comments on the list, that the people at Fortune Magazine know exactly diddly-squat about business.

Posted By Mel, Pleasanton, CA : December 19, 2007 12:33 pm

Regarding #51 (Apple), the incident occurred in 2006 not 2007. Then again, this list is from Fortune magazine, so I should lower my expectation on accuracy.

Posted By Phil, Mountain View, CA : December 19, 2007 12:32 pm

The U.N. screws up everything it does. I cannot think of a single exception. The porn instructions in the free laptops to children story does not surprise me. The U.N. should be completely disbanded.

Posted By Wendy, Federal Way, WA : December 19, 2007 12:27 pm

maybe if we executed a few incompetant politicians or their appointees we would have a less corrupt government. It seems there are a few things China does better than the U.S.

Posted By mark nichols bloomfield hills MI : December 19, 2007 12:20 pm

If we are having all this stuff made in China that is defective and dangerous, WHY IS OUR COUNTRY STILL IMPORTING, AND WE AS CONSUMERS, STILL PURCHASING THESE PRODUCTS. I try to always read labels and see where something is made before byuing. And will NEVER again knowingly purchase a product made in China. I think we should all try to buy American whenerver possible. KEEP OUR DOLLARS AT HOME.

Posted By Georgia, Pensacola, Florida : December 19, 2007 12:15 pm

uh what’s the address of that company in England, again?

Posted By gl, queens, NY : December 19, 2007 12:09 pm

Mattel apologized to china for some of the recalls……did you see that?

Posted By wha : December 19, 2007 11:54 am

It would take an American magazine to call the EU dumb. Don’t be so uptight. We’re not and that’s why the ad works in Europe.

Posted By James, Dublin, Ireland : December 19, 2007 11:53 am

9. French newspaper Le Monde [Ratatouille]
Ooh-la-la, gross!
The French daily Le Monde calls Ratatouille, Pixar’s movie about a rat in a kitchen, “one of the greatest gastronomic films in the history of cinema.”

I haven’t seen this movie, but the production costs are listed at $150M, hence the marketing budget should have been an additional $40M-$50M.
The resulting worldwide box office sales were $600M, netting the title around $1.8B for all of the licensing (DVDs, games, toys, etc.).
900% ROI doesn’t sound like something that belongs in Fortune’s 101 Dumbest Moments in Business…

Posted By Robert Hackett, Irvine CA : December 19, 2007 11:50 am

Looks like including Radiohead into this list was a bit short sighted. Turns out to be a great idea with more money going to band instead of the RIAA. But then again any idea that keeps money away from the RIAA can’t be bad. I guess its impossible to know if they would have made more money if they would have gone the conventional route but any tactic that makes the fans happy and makes money is a win win move.

Posted By Thomas, Detroit, Michigan : December 19, 2007 11:48 am

You can Boil all these Dumb Mistakes down to one comment.
GREED AND STUPIDITY WALK HAND IN HAND.
If even half of these corperations had used a little basic business 101, they would not be in this mess. But NO we are smart, we are CEO’s we don’t have to worry about whats happening on the street, we are insulated from the real world.
Welcome to the real world.

Posted By M. Glen, Madison WI : December 19, 2007 11:27 am

Ok, about half of these were hilarious. The other half made your writers look like the dumb ones. I suggest you consider downsizing this list a bit. BTW, I clicked on “Drive-by Downloads”. I’m just a curious moron, I reckon.

Posted By Greg Lindsay, Dallas, TX : December 19, 2007 11:26 am

Re: Ratatouille. I agree with Bill when he says that the author obviously never saw the movie. I don’t know a single movie that made me as hungry, or made food look as good as Ratatouille did. Seriously guys, a little bit of research and a little less opinionated tripe.

Posted By Vik, New York, NY : December 19, 2007 11:03 am

Those who retail the Chinese made goods have a responsibility to place quality control personnel with those making the goods. If they continue to accept junk; junk will continue to be made.

Posted By Ron McCumber Fayetteville, NC : December 19, 2007 11:01 am

Made in China never meant quality or safe or even desirable. It is no surprise to find their products substandard to our requirements.

Posted By gary, tulsa, ok : December 19, 2007 10:55 am

Why is everyone so negative? Only people that have something bad to say commented. There were only a few out of the 101 that were “dumb”. People find something more important to complain about.

Posted By Jessie, Minneapolis, MN : December 19, 2007 10:43 am

Why was the EU viral considered dumb? It got people talking, it got them to check out the “EU-Tube” website, and it was funny and raunchy - which, sadly, cannot be said about most of what the EU says and does. I would call that a sly victory.

Posted By Michael Dorsey, Paris, France : December 19, 2007 10:36 am

duh! ya think we should stop buying from china???? ya think there is somewhere closer that we could get our products say, like US??? Corporate greed probably wouldn’t agree to that, what’s a little lead when it comes to the bottom line?????

Posted By denise del forn plantation, florida : December 19, 2007 10:30 am

#2: “Doggie Prozac”

I stopped