Valuing Facebook
Tech Crunch landed a nifty scoop Saturday, publishing the name of a wealth-management advisor who purportedly is trying to sell shares of Facebook belonging either to an early investor or early employee. This is a peak inside the murky netherworld of investing in startups whereby shareholders in a private company can sell their shares under certain circumstances directly to other investors.
What’s particularly juicy about the revelation is that the investors are shopping a valuation significantly below the infamous $15-billion point Microsoft established when it invested in Facebook last year (the valuation at which a company raises money becomes the de facto valuation). Tech Crunch is reporting that Facebook’s valuation may have fallen as low as $3 billion, at least according to those doing the selling.
The amount an individual is willing to accept in order to dump an asset is one thing. What the company itself will take the next time it raises capital makes a significant statement about what Facebook is worth. Though Facebook has raised oodles of money – most recently the $100 million in debt financing it took from TriplePoint Capital — it undoubtedly will need more. When that happens, let’s say the valuation is still $3 billion. Microsoft would then have to write down 4/5 of its $240 million investment in Facebook. Not a big deal to Microsoft financially, but embarrassing all the same.
A final thought. Reading the purported details in Tech Crunch of the e-mail from Bill Dagley of Private Wealth Partners (I say “purported” because I have no way of verifying the veracity of an e-mail sent to Michael Arrington), I’m reminded how foolish it is to put anything sensitive in an e-mail these days — or ever. I’ve recently noticed an uptick in the number of people who pick up the phone to have a conversation they once might have e-mailed. It’s undoubtedly a healthy development, as folks like Eliot Spitzer, Frank Quattrone, and the two former fund managers at Bear Stearns assuredly would agree.
How much I’m willing to pay for facebook? 100 dollars. Not a penny more
> Microsoft would then have to write down 4/5 of its $240 million investment in Facebook. Not a big deal to Microsoft financially, but embarrassing all the same.
Not really. Nobody will be held accountable for destroying so much shareholder value, which is why so many acquisitions are made at ridiculous prices then written off a couple of years later without a hint of regret.
This valuation is used to block the acquisition of facebook by other internet powerhouse. I think that move was rather sleek.
This is not surprising. Everyone knows the company is overvalued. Most of their members are college students that do not have much spending money and change with the wind. The more value networking sites are in Business Networking at places like Linkedin, Xing, and Schmoozii. The members are professional, with more disposable income, are less likely to change with fads.
You idiots should know the difference between peak and peek.
The Microsoft deal included an arrangement for MSN to be the exclusive advertiser on Facebook. How you define the value of that and the value to Microsoft of not allowing Google to be there makes the Microsoft deal significantly different from other prices. I would presume Microsoft cared more about keeping Google out than the valuation of the shares. For them, it’s just an inventory item that may or may not be worth the price of the deal today.
Recall how much money they made by taking a stake in the company that hosted MSN originally? I think it was MFS, which turned into UUNET, which turned into MCI, which turned into WorldCom. Not sure when they sold, but I think they made more from the stock deal than they ever did with MSN.
- I am willing to pay for value. When I... More
- I plan to auction a house from govern... More
- The recession is far from over. There... More
- I'll believe the recession is over wh... More
- No, I do not think the recession is o... More
- Interesting article, and commendable ... More
- I switched careers at age 57 from the... More
- Interesting that the primary focus fr... More
- as a homedepot "home service" custome... More
- Nice article - BUT - Carol Tome is li... More



These web fads have no real income and their value is only speculative.